Home » Church & Theology » Why Did the Early Christians Go to the Synagogues?

Why Did the Early Christians Go to the Synagogues?

Join the Jesus revolution! Write your email adress to follow this blog and get updates about new posts via email.




Was it really just to pray and worship with their Jewish brothers, or had they something else in mind?

I had a discussion with a friend the other day about church buildings; while I think that they are unnecessary for the most part and that we should focus on planting house churches instead, he enjoyed church buildings and saw no reason to diminish their role. One of his arguments for using church buildings was that the early Christians went to the temple and synagogues. My response was that they went to the temple and synagogues to evangelise.

Perplexed, he asked “Where in the Bible do Christians evangelise in synagogues?” Well, here’s a summary.

Jesus in the Synagogues

Let’s start with Christ. Luke 4:15 says that Jesus “was teaching in their synagogues, and everyone praised him.” Later, in verse 21 of the same chapter, we read: “He went to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, and on the Sabbath day he went into the synagogue, as was his custom. He stood up to read, He began by saying to them, ‘Today this scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.'”

Some verses later, Luke writes: “Then he went down to Capernaum, a town in Galilee, and on the Sabbath he taught the people. In the synagogue there was a man possessed by a demon, an impure spirit… “Be quiet!” Jesus said sternly. “Come out of him!” Then the demon threw the man down before them all and came out without injuring him.” (Lk 4:31, 35)

Synagogues are mentioned again in Luke 4:44: “And he kept on preaching in the synagogues of Judea.” and 6:6: “On another Sabbath he went into the synagogue and was teaching, and a man was there whose right hand was shriveled.”

Can you see it? Every time Jesus went into a synagogue in the Gospels He was teaching and preaching, and sometimes also healing the sick. He was evangelising, sharing the good news about the Kingdom of God.

The Temple in Jerusalem

The same is true for Jesus’ visits in the Jerusalem temple: “Every day he was teaching at the temple.” (Lk 19:47) “…Jesus was teaching the people in the temple courts and proclaiming the good news…” (Lk 20:1) “Each day Jesus was teaching at the temple, and each evening he went out to spend the night on the hill called the Mount of Olives.” (Lk 21:37)

In the book of Acts, we read that the disciples also went to the temple courts every day (Acts 2:46). And just like Jesus, they evangelised. In Acts 3, Peter and John go to the temple at prayer time, but nothing indicates that they went there just to pray. On the contrary, they heal a beggar in the Name of Jesus and preach the Gospel!

Acts 5 tells us: “The apostles performed many signs and wonders among the people. And all the believers used to meet together in Solomon’s Colonnade.” (v. 12), that is in the temple courts. They then get arrested, “But during the night an angel of the Lord opened the doors of the jail and brought them out. “Go, stand in the temple courts,” he said, “and tell the people all about this new life.” (vv. 19-20).

And so they did: “At daybreak they entered the temple courts, as they had been told, and began to teach the people.” (v. 21) “Day after day, in the temple courts and from house to house, they never stopped teaching and proclaiming the good news that Jesus is the Messiah.” (v. 42)

I’m not saying that the disciples didn’t pray when they went to the temple courts – we’re called to always pray (1 Thess 5:17) – but it’s very evident that their primary goal was to preach the Gospel.

The Synagogues in Acts

The same is true for the synagogues. Acts 13:5 says “When they arrived at Salamis, they proclaimed the word of God in the Jewish synagogues.” The rest if the chapter describes a sermon Paul holds in the synagogue of Antioch in Pisidia (vv. 14-42). The next Sabbath almost the whole city gathers at the synagogue to hear Paul evangelise (v. 44).

Acts 14:1 says “At Iconium Paul and Barnabas went as usual into the Jewish synagogue. There they spoke so effectively that a great number of Jews and Greeks believed.” And later in Acts 17:1-3 we read:

When Paul and his companions had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a Jewish synagogue. As was his custom, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving that the Messiah had to suffer and rise from the dead. “This Jesus I am proclaiming to you is the Messiah,” he said.

And in Acts 17:10-13:

As soon as it was night, the believers sent Paul and Silas away to Berea. On arriving there, they went to the Jewish synagogue. Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true. As a result, many of them believed, as did also a number of prominent Greek women and many Greek men.

And Acts 17:16-17: “While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was greatly distressed to see that the city was full of idols. So he reasoned in the synagogue with both Jews and God-fearing Greeks, as well as in the marketplace day by day with those who happened to be there.”

Acts 18 writes about Paul: “Every Sabbath he reasoned in the synagogue, trying to persuade Jews and Greeks. (v. 4) and Apollo: They arrived at Ephesus, where Paul left Priscilla and Aquila. He himself went into the synagogue and reasoned with the Jews. (v. 19)

Perhaps you have enough evidence now that the early Christians evangelised in the synagogues, but let’s throw in just one more verse: “Paul entered the synagogue and spoke boldly there for three months, arguing persuasively about the kingdom of God.” (Acts 19:8)


What then are the implications of this? Here are three things I think this tells us:

1) When hanging around with those who didn’t believe in Jesus, the early Christians were not just passive chickens who tried to please everyone; they boldly proclaimed that Jesus is the Son of God to the point of death. They didn’t go to the synagogues just to pray, but to convert. When we hang around with nonbelievers today we should be just as courageous to preach the Gospel.

2) The synagogue ministry of the early church cannot be equated with meeting in a church, since the synagogue was packed with nonbelievers in Jesus while a church is packed with believers in Jesus. The church is the worst place on earth to evangelise in. Internal church meetings is what the early Christians had in their homes; the synagogue meetings were evangelistic in nature.

3) The fact that the early church went to the synagogues is thus not an argument for us building church buildings, but for us going to the synagogues. And the mosques, and the malls, and the streets. When Paul was kicked out from the synagogue he went to another public place where he could preach, often a secular or pagan place. We should go to those places as well to preach the Gospel.


  1. jonatanfransson says:

    Seems to me that it’s you and your friends argument against each other, but no actual argument from the Bible for or against church buildings. There seems only to be reasons according to what one seems to think best in terms of financial aspect. But let’s say that God would wish for his children a place to worship and pray, and those attending reaching more than 1000 people, then it’s a discussion on ones view of how many should max attend a single church. An interesting question is how roman government would have looked at christians building church buildings in the early years. Apart from this I have no problem with big church buildings and large congregations. To say the opposite would mean that God would never want His children to have a large building to gather. To my experience God told my pastor to actually build a large church building and this has been a blessing to many peoples. In the long run I believe it has helped us to administer more charity and gospel spreading than would otherwise have been possible.

  2. […] att påstå att den apostoliska livsstilen plötsligt inte är normerande! Att de tidiga kristna gick till synagogan för att evangelisera bekymrar inte status quo-teologen, för hens syfte är alls inte att eftersträva en biblisk […]

  3. […] Why Did the Early Christians Go to the Synagogues […]

  4. Alan Zickefoose says:

    Did I miss it or can you please show me the scripture again where “The fact that the early church went to the synagogues”. I see where the apostles did but didn’t the church actually meet in homes?

    • Hello Alan! The claim from those who argue that the synagogues were some sort of pre-church building is that not only the apostles went there but the local church as a whole. That’s the claim I response to and so I pre-suppose that it’s true. I think that there is some biblical support for it (though admittedly not a lot), such as Acts 19:9: “But some of them [in the synagogue] became obstinate; they refused to believe and publicly maligned the Way. So Paul left them. He took the disciples with him and had discussions daily in the lecture hall of Tyrannus.” If he took disciples with him from the synagogue, surely he was not alone when he went there.


  5. […] I sin första artikel nämner Arenius i förbifarten att frikyrkorna snabbt skaffade sig kyrkobyggnader precis som den tidiga kyrkan. Nå, de ca 300 år det tog för fornkyrkan att bygga särskilda gudstjänshus skulle jag inte beskriva som snabbt. Det var inte så att de tidiga kristna var ivriga att bygga kyrkor men hindrades av förföljelse: den kyrkohistoriska forskningen visar inte någon stötte strävan, och förföljelserna var ofta lokala och sporadiska vilket gjorde att många kristna trivdes bra i sina husförsamlingar även utan förföljelse. Mötena i templet och i synagogorna hade ett tydligt evangeliserande syfte, som jag skrivit om tidigare. […]

  6. Shoshana says:

    You are correct to point out that Yeshua and His disciples met at synagogues and at the Temple, after all they were all Jews and that was their custom. Besides, there were no church buildings at the time. That came much later. Even when the Ruach Ha Kodesh (Holy Spirit) fell upon them they were at an upper room of the Temple praying (as they were told) thus the other Jews there seeing them thought they were drunk.
    The problem here is the implication that these Jews who accepted Yeshua as the long awaited promised Messiah converted to Christians. From a purely historical perspective Christians, or crestianus, were the pagan followers of Serapis Crestus from Alexandria Egypt, 200 plus years prior to Yeshua ministering as Second Adam. Back then you either were a Jew or a pagan, no in between. The other Jews called them ‘Nazarenes’ as it was customary to often call disciples by the town of their Rabbi. The disciples called themselves followers of The Way but the term ‘crestianus’, that is Christians, was given to them by pagan Romans and Greeks. Let us remember that in Acts 15 the apostles agreed that for pagans to attend synagogue with them it was not necessary that they should undergo circumcision first as was the custom (and follow rabbinical halacha or laws) for Gentiles joining Judaism but simply take the 4 steps assuring all they left their pagan ways and then every Shabbat at synagogue they would learn Torah with the rest.

  7. Cause they weren’t Christians at all, they were Jews. The Gentile newcomers were expected to join them and learn Torah every Shabbat once they set aside their pagan religious customs (the 4 steps). Rome changed all that.

  8. The notion that the followers of Yeshua/Jesus were Christians can not be substantiated with scripture. Yeshua clearly stated He came for the lost sheep of the house of Israel. This lost sheep was and is in many instances living mostly as Gentiles. Yeshua’s disciples were all practicing Jews, same as Yeshua who demonstrated the correct way to follow Torah. Back then both Yeshua and His disciples taught from what has been sadly mislabeled “Old Testament” (as if Yahveh’s word could ever be old). Nobody had Bibles, the Torah, and the writings of the prophets, etc were in scrolls at the synagogue so if anyone wanted to learn and discuss Scripture that was the main place. Sure some met at houses but the main place to congregate was the synagogue. At that time the custom was for Gentiles to get circumcised first which meant they had to learn and agree to follow all the additional rabbinical laws, the takanot, something Yeshua’s disciples rightly objected to. Yeshua did not come to start a church, congregation or assembly; He already had one, Israel. The replacement notion fostered by Rome was part of their politically influenced power grab.
    The church would do well to return to its original Hebraic roots and leave the Roman- Babylonian system behind.

  9. […] in the temple courts, which had the result of people coming to Christ every day (Acts 2:46-47). I’ve written elsewhere about why this means that all churches should evangelize collectively today. But even though the […]

  10. Shoshana says:

    Technically it wasn’t the early Christians, or crestianus as they were called by the Romans at one point. It was the Netzarim Jews or followers of The Way that continued to attend synagogue every Shabbat, and as we see in Acts 15;21, later invited Gentiles to join them once these set aside their idolatry (v20).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

The author

Micael Grenholm, a Swedish charismactivist, apologist and author.

Micael Grenholm, a Swedish charismactivist, apologist and author.

Check out my YouTube channel!

A Living Alternative

God vs Inequality


%d bloggers like this: